OK, they are simply in my Inbox.**
Team Baldwin
Ed Markey
Can't Recall... LOL*
...
Mean~while?
*(7-24-15) Sherrod Brown
** lede or ship (or sort of outliers)
Showing posts with label Progressive Caucus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Progressive Caucus. Show all posts
Thursday, July 23, 2015
Thursday, November 04, 2010
Capitalism Owes Obama an Apology.
How Obama Saved Capitalism
and Lost the Midterms Timothy Egan The New York Times
Subset of misunderstanding: Bush was good for Wall Street. The bailouts were passed under Obama. "Government Motors" was socialism.
It is not very energizing to whine that people don't get it. But it is also the fault of the media and the Democrats for not getting the message out. However analysis is still coming in. Reportedly: Tea Party success was 60%**. Progressive Democratic successes was 99%***, which I am not so* sure how it was calculated.
* this was not the source, in fact not even followed by me(which I don't know what that may be telling)
** except for this
*** I heard this but can't really believe it. I can believe how hard it is to google an answer. (more on file)
[Saved in Draft, to be updated.]
[My headline is a bit unfair, it is not really about Obama****, it is about the middle class and moderates.(See *)]
****[Update: I have used my limit of asterisks- oh heck, cross thread. New thread: too much or not enough? Cause and Effect and the Weaver.]
and Lost the Midterms Timothy Egan The New York Times
Subset of misunderstanding: Bush was good for Wall Street. The bailouts were passed under Obama. "Government Motors" was socialism.
It is not very energizing to whine that people don't get it. But it is also the fault of the media and the Democrats for not getting the message out. However analysis is still coming in. Reportedly: Tea Party success was 60%**. Progressive Democratic successes was 99%***, which I am not so* sure how it was calculated.
* this was not the source, in fact not even followed by me(which I don't know what that may be telling)
** except for this
*** I heard this but can't really believe it. I can believe how hard it is to google an answer. (more on file)
[Saved in Draft, to be updated.]
[My headline is a bit unfair, it is not really about Obama****, it is about the middle class and moderates.(See *)]
****[Update: I have used my limit of asterisks- oh heck, cross thread. New thread: too much or not enough? Cause and Effect and the Weaver.]
Monday, November 16, 2009
Progress is Global
...and incremental, pragmatic, and needs to reflect diverse views and dynamics. It also should put the health care progress in proper perspective, as there are both employment and international consequences to changes, which congress must be in on addressing. Despite the fears of some, this is not a dictatorship or even a one party system but a triumvirate for the tetrahedron of the people.
[Reference Base *...]
[[Setting the tea table? Huffington Post, Ron Paul and Kucinich on Auditing the Federal Reserve. And a placemat for Ed Schultz in Seattle November 15th. ]]
[update: 11-17-09 Just Foreign Policy - Progressive Caucus ]
* link added [update: 11-20-09 The Pacific President (CAP-TP)]
[Reference Base *...]
[[Setting the tea table? Huffington Post, Ron Paul and Kucinich on Auditing the Federal Reserve. And a placemat for Ed Schultz in Seattle November 15th. ]]
[update: 11-17-09 Just Foreign Policy - Progressive Caucus ]
* link added [update: 11-20-09 The Pacific President (CAP-TP)]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)